I did not have Relational Asthmatics with that Woman…
I did not have Relational Asthmatics with that Woman, althoug I did cough in her Lemongrass Soup
An Interview with Michael Portnoy
He dreams of an object becoming a force and has already coined a term for it: ‘objection’. The New York artist, choreographer and performer Michael Portnoy is obsessed with energy and movement and continually puts it into practice. For instance, with table-sized game boards that literally make the players dance to his tune.The first time I saw or experienced the work of Michael Portnoy live was at The Sculpture Center in New York during the exhibition Casino Ilinx (2008). There he had constructed a series of gambling tables made out of precious and less precious materials: wood, mirror, sand, felt, bone, brass, vinyl, and shell. In corners and recesses in the building’s basement he also showed peculiar small objects and game pieces, eerily lit, like relics or ‘keys’ waiting to be mysteriously reactivated. I felt a bit like an uninvited guest – allowed to watch, but not part of what felt like the inner circle of those already initiated. A year later I invited Portnoy to partake in an exhibition at the Kunsthalle Basel, where he realized the piece FILZZUNGEUNGEWISS, a gambling table made entirely from felt, at which four players at a time had to crouch down and follow his instructions. And amazingly, they did. ‘Amazingly’ because the instructions he gave ran something like: ‘One to the nine, two to the five. The FIVE! The FIVE! Drop the two. Now hold it. Ten on the table. Re-release the table to complete.’ I was of course more or less invited this time, but can imagine that the viewers there felt the same ambiguous relationship as I had at The Sculpture Center: at once potential actors, perhaps even ‘aides’, and at the same time on-lookers.
You describe yourself as a ‘New York based multimedia artist, musician, performer and Director of Behaviour.’ Can you tell me what you mean exactly by ‘director of behaviour’?
‘This title seemed to be the best to describe both my role as choreographer of people on a stage, where I’m more interested in behaviour than in dance, and my role as a creator of situations where people are meant to behave in specific ways with each other.’
You seem to play with this border between coded exclusivity and open participation. Can you say more about this, maybe in connection to a recent ongoing project entitled Session?
‘I have a deep ambivalence between wanting to play with everyone, a kind of ludic evangelism which wants to convert the whole world into players, playing with everyone in order to find the people who can really play, or just wanting to play with the people I already suspect can play. In Session, a roving project space for strangers, I have a database of people who’ve signed up to come alone to be in a room with strangers and do something which they don’t know beforehand. They’ve agreed to try to follow the rules, and if they don’t like it, they can always go into the bathroom and eat a sandwich. The difference between Session and the abstract gambling games you’ve mentioned is that in Session, the rules might be hard or impossible to follow, but they still make sense. In the gambling games, not only are the rules always changing, but they are obscured or hidden, communicated only partially through riddle, gesture, and code. They’re abstractions. Most of the game is figuring out what the hell you are supposed to do. Both methods, call them constraint vs. vertigo, aim to activate the creative faculties, the first by narrowing the attention on an absurd premise, the second by dangling a protoverbal model, in a bright haze on an unsteady ground, that encourages slippage into the intuitive.’
What is it that attracts you to the absurd?
‘I usually avoid answering these sorts of questions, but, since I trust you, I’ll make an exception. I was first attracted to her when I was around seven. Or perhaps it was longer ago. It took longer than you’d think to collect enough particles of her to make an impression. She’s actually quite dowsy, in the centre, that is, I mean most of her is chalked over-aggressively around her, making a kind of bronchospastic dust tunnel of a gal. But fucking hot. The hot dust of woman. As you might imagine, I’d jump right in the centre and land with half my tongue scraped on the sidewalk, and she’d already be a block down the street, which, as a budding trenggiling, or scaly spine-eater, sorry, spiny scale-eater, was a calculable detriment to my practice, although I did have a touch over 20 cm of tongue to spare. But to answer your question, no, I did not have relational asthmatics with that woman, although I did cough in her lemongrass soup.’
I won’t ever get an answer, will I?
‘Ha ha!’
Avoiding?
‘I could have answered but thought it was more fun this way.’
What could you have answered, in short?
‘It’s actually quite a hard question to answer; it’s like asking what attracts you to funny things. But if we really want to get into it, the Absurd is some heavy duty stuff, I mean this is no place for me to go making a mess of Kierkegaard.’
Do you prefer not understanding why you’re attracted to something?
‘Yes. No, actually no. But I think I did actually answer the question by saying it is an essentially a bunch of chalk dust around a void…that keeps one lurching forward.’
I got that. And I get that it needs to remain open or unsolved in order to maintain a certain power. Speaking of which – and what a perfect segue – I wanted to ask you about an older work. Your so-called Soy Bomb stunt at the 1998 Grammy Awards. Online, there’s an extract of an interview held at the time, where you qualify the work as ‘a dense, nutritional, transformational life explosion’.
‘Oh boy. I hadn’t really planned to give you a proper answer on that one either. I feel like I’ve already talked about it years ago and it’s much more interesting, in relation to that “piece”, to keep the meaning and intention unstable.’
But I also ask because there’s something there that’s still in your practice now. So what was Soy Bomb about?
‘My usual answer is that it was a two-word poem written by myself and artist Marianne Vitale that was danced in the form of a rupture. But that’s boring. In truth, I was hired to stand behind Bob Dylan, while he sang live during the Grammy’s, and to give him a “good vibe”. The nature of this vibe was not further specified. So, I wrote a two-word poem with Marianne who drew it on my chest in permanent marker. I leapt next to Dylan, peeling off my shirt, and presented the poem by moving my body in such a way as to create maximal good vibrations. These vibrations were transferred to their most useful home, in the diaphragms of the viewing audience, causing warm air to be catapulted in laughter to the sensory soul which, thus heated and disturbed, created a recognizable movement in the intelligence, per Aristotle.’
One feels it – undeniably – even now, watching it on YouTube. But that might also because of your superior dancing abilities…. You have a background in dance. When did you move more towards visual arts? Or do you not see a shift in your practice?
‘I moved more towards visual arts around 2006, even though I still make the occasional dance now. A lot of my recent work has a strong movement component, certainly the High Action Drama Paintings. The abstract gambling games are very dancey too, in the way the players are taught to move, and in the way the game pieces move around the little stage of the tables.’
I don’t know if you remember this, but one night you sat down at my table and started telling jokes. The first one began like any other joke: ‘A guys walks into a bar. He immediately sees a priest, a rabbi and a minister drinking beers at a table….’ And it went on an on. Five minutes you were telling this story that included rabbits, I think a turtle at some point, and a prostitute. And then it ended. No punch line. You smiled as though the end was obvious, and obviously funny and immediately started the second joke and a third. But you never explained, you never stepped out of role. I know you also held an event around the telling of jokes called An Evening of Experimental Jokes (and other joke swills), at Andrew Kreps Gallery. Can you talk about your explorations into jokes?
‘You’ve got it all wrong. The first one started like this: A guy walks into a bar. The bar was run by a consortium of rabbis who’d just been indicted in a muffin-laundering scheme implicating prominent members of the New Jersey legislature, the Greater Methodist Ministry and several guys with bibs. The guys with bibs were huddled in the corner doing a couple of highly significant things with the nose of one of the rabbis, the least of which involved bibbing and re-bibbing the rigid knuckle in the second focal periphery from the nose, which the rabbi had used to pound down the assess of blue and raz berry muffins. The muffins were then stuffed, of course, ass full with specialized detergents capable of cleaning out the fucksuck left by weasels and bran-mites. So, you understand, these were Jewish muffins voided of all the good good fucksuck left by nature, but sold as proper muffins! At full price! From the back of the bar! At just that moment, 70 hookers come in from the right, and 70 from below! And the flugelhorns go, PA PRAPATA PRATA PATA…. No turtles.’
I may have added the turtles. Is that OK? Or am I not meant to touch the original?
‘Okay, look. I’ve done lots of things to jokes. You can do as much to jokes as you can to canvas. Much more, actually. You can have relationals with them and you can use them to proceed from a sequential realization of operations to parallel or simultaneous ones, to replace a stretching or compression by a bending, or to move from the continuous flow of energy or substance to a periodic or pulsating one, end quote. I made an opera about jokes, the sound and beat of jokes or joke jokes, danced by professors and morons [The K Sound – ed.]. I built wood shoes like jokes, that rise off the toe and into the mouth, so I can sing ideas back into them, ideas that sound like jokes but behave like full-blooded biathletes, in the water and shooting themselves in the root, at the same time.’
You mean The Dudion Levers, the wooden ‘shoes’ that are also musical instruments or conductors. How about your doing things with things – what role does the object or the sculptural play in your work? I’m thinking here of your recent High Action Drama Painting performance as well, which was far more ephemeral, you could say, than The Dudion Levers. But even considering the gambling tables, these are incredible objects, ones painstakingly made. So where’s the balance between the need to make a beautiful thing and the need to break things apart, for instance language, and keep object and understanding floating?
‘Damn good question. I need a good place to store ideas, and pretty things sometimes have trap doors that’ll do the trick. You can also break up a language or two and stuff it in a pretty thing’s muffin, as I explained earlier. But seriously, beauty, craft and touchability function in the gambling tables as a lure which helps ease the players’ descent into cuckoo land. They’re also games, and so they should look and feel like games, a bit. The object assemblages in The Dudion Levers serve a more complex function. Their beauty is a lure to the ideas which, literally, created them. Each group of three objects was used to inspire an idea for an art project, in which those three objects play a role. This idea was sung into ‘The Instrument’, which transform the instructions into a majestic instrumental anthem that was simultaneously inscribed in mother-of-pearl graphic notation into the objects. The High Action Drama Paintings are imprecise recordings of the very circuitous and dramatic routes the paint took to reach the painting surface. Only if one watched the video would one see the ridiculousness that led up to that little grouping of dots.’
What would be your dream work? Or your dream circumstances for work? I get the feeling you’re creating these quite amazing situations and you get invited by curators to come recreate them, for them, temporarily gracing their premises. But somehow your work remains beyond the structure of the show and the basic set-up of the institution; as though your work ‘lands’ briskly in various institutions but that its core can never be fully grounded in or corrupted by their too menial, too ‘earthly’ or banal concerns.
‘My dream circumstances are just to be able to produce what I dream. I like working with Swiss technical staff. At the moment, I’m hooked on the idea of wanting to hitch a laser beam to my voice that rips through matter as I sing. It’s coming along nicely and will be an attachment to ‘The Instrument’. I’m into exuberant art these days. And an idea of objections: an objection is when an object becomes a force, or when a force is so hard as to become object. Actual art.’
Maxine Kopsa is editor of Metropolis MMaxine Kopsa is editor of Metropolis M
Michael Portnoy’s work is being presented at:Michael Portnoy’s work is being presented at:
Performa 09, New York Performa 09, New York
4 – 9 November 20094 – 9 November 2009
Kadist Art Foundation, Paris Kadist Art Foundation, Paris
3 December 2009 – 7 February 20103 December 2009 – 7 February 2010
For more information, see: www.strangergames.com For more information, see: www.strangergames.com
Maxine Kopsa